SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost of cutting SNAP goes beyond the dinner table
Grocery prices continue to rise, but fewer Oklahomans are receiving help buying food. Since July 2025, more than 130,000 Oklahomans have lost Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits — a decline of more than 19 percent. For families losing assistance, the immediate result is a tighter grocery budget and harder choices among food, rent, utilities, and medication. But the damage won’t stop at the checkout line. SNAP cuts also drain spending from local businesses, increase demand on food banks, and undermine the health and economic stability of communities across Oklahoma. [Kati Malicoate / OK Policy]
|
|
|
|
Legislative interim study highlights risks of SQ 847 (Capitol Update)
The House County and Municipal Government Committee held an interim study (IS 26-50) last week requested by Rep. Mike Kelley, R-Yukon, to study the growing challenges for counties in Oklahoma to balance increasing service demands with constrained revenue. However, it morphed into a discussion of the potential detrimental effects of SQ 847 which will be decided by voters this November. [Steve Lewis / Capitol Update]
- Learn more about the interim study and SQ 847 from OK Policy’s Fiscal Policy Analyst Aanahita Irani Ervin:
|
|
|
Policy Matters: Good state policy starts with good information
The federal government released new poverty data last week, but a key part of the story is still missing for Oklahomans. The Census Bureau‘s Current Population Survey provided national estimates but lacks the state-level data Oklahoma policymakers need. The newly released data reminds us that programs like SNAP and Medicaid help reduce poverty and strengthen families’ financial stability. However, national statistics can only tell us so much about what Oklahomans are experiencing. [Shiloh Kantz / The Journal Record]
|
|
|
|
Join us for Voices in Action — Turning community conversations into statewide change
This summer, we hosted listening sessions in towns and cities across the state to provide an opportunity for the public to have conversations with our fellow Oklahomans about issues that matter most in their communities. This October, we’re coming back to share what we heard in those communities and statewide, and to discuss ways we can use our collective power to make a difference on those issues.
|
|
|
|
"Creating barriers to healthcare coverage for the most vulnerable needlessly puts people’s lives at risk and inevitably drives up the cost of care for everyone. These are folks who should be focused on getting the help and care they desperately need, not overcoming even more obstacles."
- Columbus City, Ohio Attorney Zach Klein, speaking about a lawsuit challenging the federal rule for medical exemptions from Medicaid work requirements. [Oklahoma Voice]
|
|
|
|
Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8)
The Housing Choice Voucher Program (also known as Housing Choice Voucher Program Section 8) is the nation’s largest housing assistance program. Under the program, eligible recipients receive housing vouchers that they can use to rent apartments or homes from participating landlords. Eligible households are responsible for finding their own housing, but the rental unit must meet health and safety standards. Voucher recipients are responsible for paying 30 percent of a unit’s housing costs, with the voucher covering the remainder of the rest up to a limit, called a payment standard, that is based on local estimates of fair market rate. Seventy-five percent of new recipients of vouchers must have “extremely low income,” defined as below the federal poverty level or 30 percent of the area median income, whichever is higher.
The Section 8 program is operated nationally by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), in partnership with some 2,170 state and local public housing agencies (PHAs). In Oklahoma, Section 8 vouchers are administered by the Oklahoma Housing Finance Authority and by some 105 local PHAs that are responsible for establishing fair market rate standards and verifying that rental units meet federal housing quality standards. Each agency has a cap on the number of vouchers it administers.
Nationally, housing choice vouchers serve some 5.3 million people, of whom 38 percent are children and 17 percent are over the age of 62. The program has been shown to sharply reduce homelessness, lift more than a million people above the poverty line, and give families more options of where to live. However, due to funding limitations, all federal housing assistance programs combined serve only about 1 in 4 households that would qualify for assistance.
In addition to vouchers that can be used to rent units that tenants select, up to 30 percent of vouchers can be used for subsidies — called project-based vouchers — that are tied to a particular property rather than a particular family and thus can help pay for the construction or rehabilitation of housing for people with low incomes. Project-based vouchers serve some 333,000 households nationally.
[Look up more key terms to understand Oklahoma politics and government here]
|
|
|
|
Opinion: Congress Should Reject House Cuts That Would Leave Nearly Half a Million More People Without Stable Homes
Congress has passed a short-term funding measure to fund the government into December, but it still must pass full-year funding bills for fiscal year 2027. While the Senate has not yet introduced any of its 2027 appropriations bills, House funding bills introduced so far propose major cuts. In June, a Republican-led House committee passed a funding bill for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that would leave about 471,000 fewer people receiving housing vouchers to help them afford rent in 2027. (See Table 1 for state-level estimates and Table 2 for a demographic breakdown.) Final 2027 funding must prevent this loss of assistance and advance other important housing priorities, such as protecting homelessness assistance.
Housing vouchers and other rental assistance bridge the gap between a family’s income and rent, providing stable, affordable housing and helping prevent evictions and reduce homelessness. Research shows these programs have cascading benefits in other aspects of life, such as supporting people’s mental and physical health, helping children thrive, and improving households’ financial security.
Yet only 1 in 4 renters with low incomes who need assistance actually receive it due to funding limitations, even though a near record number of renters are paying more than half of their incomes on rent. Without the stability that rental assistance provides, these families don’t have the money for other basic expenses. Many are only one setback away from losing their homes.
The House bill’s funding levels would leave even more people struggling to afford housing because they aren’t sufficient to maintain current levels of assistance in the Housing Choice Voucher program. Since families use these vouchers to rent homes in the private market, the program needs annual funding increases to respond to fluctuations in rental costs. Without an increase in 2027, local agencies that administer vouchers would have to stop helping new families from the waiting list when others leave the program.
Congress did recently address one pressing rental assistance concern. The short-term funding measure includes a provision that directs HUD to provide new vouchers to about 40,000 families that would have otherwise lost assistance at the end of the year when the Emergency Housing Voucher program runs out of funding. The new vouchers will enable these families to continue to receive assistance as long as they need it, protecting them from being pushed back into homelessness.
While Congress averted that crisis, the inadequate voucher funding levels in the House 2027 funding bill would deny many other families the rental assistance they urgently need. As Congress continues its work on the 2027 appropriations bills, it should reject the cuts in the House bill. Lawmakers should also fund additional vouchers so more families get the help they need affording rent, a necessary step toward the larger goal of providing assistance to everyone who needs it.
[Sonya Acosta / Center on Budget and Policy Priorities]
|
|
|
|
2,450% - The percentage increase in the number of people with no criminal record being held in ICE detention on any given day during President Trump’s first year back in office. The number of “at-large” arrests in American communities has increased by 600%. [American Immigration Council]
10.5% - Of the 1,443 people who were experiencing homelessness during Tulsa’s annual Point in Time Count in January of 2026, 10.5% said an eviction was the factor keeping them unhoused. [Housing Solutions]
18,000 - The number of Arkansas adults who lost Medicaid coverage in the first seven months of the state’s work requirements during the first Trump administration — about 1 in 4 people subject to them. Arkansas was the first state to fully implement Medicaid work requirements, and many people lost coverage because of reporting and administrative hurdles. Research found no increase in employment. [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities]
70% - The average share of income a family can lose within six months when a parent is detained or deported over immigration status. That sudden loss can make it difficult to afford groceries, housing, and other essentials. [American Immigration Council]
43% - Of the nearly 1 million Oklahoma children and adults who are enrolled in Medicaid, more than 2 in 5 (43%) live in rural areas. [KFF]
|
|
|
|
Dying in Detention: Rising Deaths in an Expanding US Immigration Detention System: In the 500 days between President Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20, 2025 and June 4, 2026, 52 people died in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody in the United States. The mortality rate of deaths in ICE custody is at its highest level in over a decade and has more than doubled since Trump’s second term began. The rate is nearly four times that of the Biden administration, and more than two and a half times as high as that of the first Trump administration. [Human Rights Watch]
A Tool for Justice: The Cost Benefit Analysis of Legal Aid: The world faces a global justice gap and the poor and vulnerable are the most affected. The Justice for All Report of the Task Force on Justice reveals that around 5.1 billion people today—two-thirds of the world’s population—lack meaningful access to justice. Lack of access to justice traps people in vicious cycles of poverty, inequality and marginalization. The burden of this justice gap falls disproportionally on the most vulnerable, including women, children, minorities and people with disabilities. Lack of access to justice also increases the risk of conflict and violence within a society. [The International Bar Association & The World Bank Group]
State Legislative Sessions Highlight Choice Between Protecting Coverage and Deepening Harm After Federal Medicaid Cuts: The $900 billion in Medicaid cuts in the harmful 2025 Republican reconciliation law (H.R. 1) will take away health coverage and raise costs for millions of families. Roughly 7.5 million people could lose Medicaid and become uninsured by 2034 due to the law, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Restrictive federal rules issued recently to implement the law could lead to even larger coverage losses. Although the cuts’ full impact will build over time — some do not take effect until 2027 or later — states’ 2026 legislative sessions provide a revealing first look at their differing responses to the federal cuts. [Center on Budget and Policy Priorities]
“Show Me Your Papers”: A Deep Dive into the Dangerous 287(g) Task Force Model: The Trump administration is determined to radically transform every law enforcement agency (LEA) in the United States–local, county, state, and federal–into cogs in a sweeping immigration enforcement machine. What was once the purview of federal agents is becoming the day to day activity of police officers, through the proliferation of 287(g) agreements. Through 287(g) agreements, ICE is extending its arm deep into communities, threatening everyday life in neighborhoods across the country. With that extended reach comes a new expansion of well-documented harms: rampant racial profiling, overpolicing of historically targeted communities, and the rollback of police reforms aimed at transparency and accountability. [Immigrant Legal Resource Center]
Medicaid Coverage Supports Rural Patients, Hospitals, and Communities: One in seven Americans live in rural areas and rely on rural hospitals and health systems for the health and well-being of their communities. The importance of rural hospitals cannot be overstated, as individuals who live in these communities face greater challenges in accessing health care due to a number of factors, including a lack of affordable coverage options, geographic isolation and a shortage of health care providers. Medicaid, which covers 16.1 million people in rural communities, plays a vital role in addressing these barriers and sustaining rural hospitals so they can continue to support patients and their communities. Cuts to the Medicaid program, such as those enacted by Congress, will have a devastating impact on rural hospitals and patients. [American Hospital Association]
|
|
|
|
What’s up this week at Oklahoma Policy Institute? The Weekly Wonk shares our most recent publications and other resources to help you stay informed about Oklahoma. Numbers of the Day and Policy Notes are from our daily news briefing, In The Know.
Click here to subscribe to In The Know.
|
|
|
|
Contact
Oklahoma Policy Institute
907 S. Detroit Ave #1005
Tulsa, OK 74120
United States
918-794-3944 | info@okpolicy.org
|
If you believe you received this message in error or wish to no longer receive emails from us, please unsubscribe.
|
|
|
|
|
