Editorial, Enid News & Eagle: Initiative petition process doesn't need 'fixed'
The Oklahoma Legislature is again looking at ways to make it more difficult for voter-led petition drives to get on the state ballot, or to increase the threshold of votes needed for approval.
Such changes need to be killed.
Oklahoma currently has a good and reasonable process regarding initiative petitions. It is not easy for such questions to get on the ballot. In the last decade, nearly 40 citizen-led initiative petitions have been filed. But, only seven of those qualified for a ballot, and voters approved some and rejected some. The system seems to be working appropriately.
Oklahoma's ballot initiative process is enshrined in the state Constitution. The Legislature does not have the independent authority to change most aspects of the initiative petition process. It can, if desired, vote to put a constitutional amendment to a statewide vote of the people.
That system continues to be reasonable — accessible, but not irresponsibly easy.
Oklahoma has deep populist roots and a good system of direct democracy through the initiative petition process. The initiative process provided by the Oklahoma Constitution is based in principles of agrarian populism. Since statehood, Oklahomans have had a general distrust of government trying to exercise too much authority over the individual. The initiative process allows a path, if enough people agree, for Oklahoma residents to put a question on the state ballot.
So, when does that happen? Usually a petition happens when the Legislature refuses to do its job, or it acts in a way that angers a substantial number of people.
Legislators need to stop trying to thwart the initiative petition process. We don't need to add additional burdens to this direct democracy procedure that has been Oklahoma's legacy.
If legislators want fewer citizen-led petitions, they need to work harder on the serious needs we face instead of kicking the can down the road.
[Editorial / Enid News & Eagle]