Opinion: Oklahoma's leaders chase another bad tax dream
They just can't help themselves.
Despite a sputtering economy, slowing tax revenues and unprecedented uncertainty about federal funding, Oklahoma's legislative leaders are hellbent on cutting the state income tax.
Old dreams die hard? Perhaps. After all, generations of Republicans were raised on the supposed genius of Supply-Side economics – the theory that slashing state revenues actually increases them … to overflowing.
Except, of course, it doesn't.
Less than a decade ago, a series of state income tax cuts left Oklahoma in fiscal crisis when the economy soured – something that happens periodically in an economy overly-dependent on two industries: agriculture and oil/gas.
Things got so bad, in fact, the GOP-controlled statehouse presided over a statewide teacher walkout that helped produce the once-unthinkable: a legislative supermajority (required by State Question 640) hiked gross production taxes to get the state out of the red.
Alas, in the age of term limits, few lawmakers who endured the political pain of displeasing Harold Hamm and other carbon barons are around to warn the current crop against the tax-cutting folly. So, off go Gov. Kevin Stitt, House Speaker Kyle Hilbert and Senate President Pro Tem Lonnie Paxton, positioning Oklahoma on the edge of the fiscal cliff again by moving to cut the state's largest single revenue source, the income tax … which also happens to be the state's fairest tax, because it's based on ability to pay.
There's no reason to think the Legislature's Republican supermajority won't fall in line on the tax cut – from 4.75% to 4.5% – which sets in motion additional future cuts if the state hits certain targets. And there'll be all sorts of cheering in the session's final hours about how meaningful the cuts are to Sooners of modest means.
The reality: A Senate analysis suggests a family of four with an income of $50,000 would save about $137 a year – the equivalent of two McDonald's Happy Meals a month. OKPolicy concludes Oklahomans earning less than $79,700 a year would save between $9 and $95 annually in taxes.
So, if the quarter percentage point cut reduces state revenues by $306 million, who's cashing in? Not surprisingly, it's the state's highest income earners: the top 1% will save $2,936 annually, according to OKPolicy.
That's chicken feed for anyone earning $683,500 or more annually. But $306 million in lost revenue is serious coin when considering Oklahoma's bottom-of-the-barrel investments in vital services translate into abysmal socioeconomic rankings in things like public education and public health.
This isn't lost on state business leaders, by the way – only 18% support using state savings for tax cuts, according to an annual State Chamber survey. How should the money be spent? Business leaders are clear: investments in education, health and infrastructure.
What makes prioritizing an income tax cut even more preposterous is that Oklahoma already is a low tax state … which is one of the reasons it ranks so poorly in so many of the aforementioned categories.
How l-o-w? A recent WalletHub analysis found Oklahoma with the nation's 42nd lowest tax burden – just 7% – which translates into about 2% on income tax and 3.6% on sales and excise taxes.
Still, some of the state's uber-conservative fat cats, including the governor, insist eliminating the state income tax is Oklahoma's best path forward. It's the old we-must-be-more-like-Texas canard.
It's true Texas doesn't have a state income tax, but that doesn't mean Texans are getting off easier: They pay significantly higher property and sales/excise taxes. According to WalletHub, Sooners pay $1,520 annually on homes priced at the median state value, compared with Texans' $4,111.
Truth is, cutting the state income tax is a fool's errand. It will cost lawmakers and taxpayers alike … eventually.
[Arnold Hamilton / The Journal Record]